From eight years to investigate violations of the provisions of the central data psychiatric problems to see, since the rules were introduced eight to 2018 , the number of questions dealt with the overall upward trend, especially in 2015 Nian Zhi 2018 years, the number of questions dealt with from 36911 onwards increased year by year to 65055 Up. Among them, the number of issues investigated, the number of people dealt with, and the number of people subject to party discipline and government affairs in 2018 increased by 27.5% , 28.7% , and 30.9% respectively compared with 2017 , which are the highest values ??since the introduction of the eight central regulations.polka dot price tomorrow, 2019 Nian 6 Yue 24- Politburo meeting held to consider "the preparation of the Chinese Communist Party agency regulations" and "Regulations on the Work of the Communist Party in rural China," and so on.polka dot price tomorrow, "The source of these 'documents' is not clear, and the authenticity cannot be verified." Zheng Liang mentioned at the beginning of the report that the report focused on the content of the New York Times only from an academic perspective. "For a long time, China ’s nationalities and religions Policies, including counter-terrorism practices, are often misunderstood by the outside world. One of the reasons is that these policies and measures usually exist in the language of documents, and related research is mainly concentrated in the academic world and various academic papers in the Chinese world. Therefore, it is difficult to fully understand and disseminate it to the outside world. "Zheng Liang believes that the content of the" leakage documents "in the New York Times report itself provides a text that can be analyzed and studied, and at the level of media and social attention. This was a rare opportunity for public opinion to focus on and understand China's long-standing ethnic and religious policies and counter-terrorism practices. Unfortunately, the content of these reports in the Western media is often biased.
